Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.6 to 65.7.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1269 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1255 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1265 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1238 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1262 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1285 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1278 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1245 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1267 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1265 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.