Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
UpstageSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 47.2.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 42.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1399 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1416 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1427 |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Solar Pro4 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.