Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.7-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 47.4.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index37.838.8
Released2025-02-052026-01-19
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked3221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding13221383
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13241356
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Math13091355
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—58.3%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Expert13051357
GPQA Diamond—60.5%
MMLU-Pro72%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English13231330
LMArena Chinese13391403
LMArena French13471332
LMArena German13061337
LMArena Korean13251283
LMArena Russian13281332
LMArena Spanish13131350
LMArena Japanese1301—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13051327
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13201345

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text13301351
LMArena Creative Writing13191297
LMArena Multi-Turn13071342
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1125
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.7-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper