Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Pixtral Large

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 32.9.
  • Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index37.832.2
Released2025-02-052024-11-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
LMArena Coding1322—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1324—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math1309—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—
LMArena Expert1305—

Multimodal Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
LMArena Vision11001089

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
LMArena Non-English1323—
LMArena Chinese1339—
LMArena French1347—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1328—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1305—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
LMArena Longer Query1320—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LitePixtral Large
LMArena Text1330—
LMArena Creative Writing1319—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—988
WildBench79%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1307—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Pixtral Large?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Pixtral Large share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper