Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 35.5.
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1186 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1145 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1152 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1142 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1099 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1145 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1092 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1131 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1162 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1150 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1129 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1108 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.