Noometry

Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index32.237.8
Released2023-09-062025-02-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
LMArena Coding—1322

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts10071324
LiveBench Reasoning—50.1%
DTBench—52.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13—
ForecastBench—57.1
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
LiveBench—54.3%
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Omni-MATH—37.4%
LiveBench Math—58.1%
LMArena Math—1309
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
MMLU-Pro—72%
GPQA (HELM)—50%
LMArena Expert—1305
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Vision—1100

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Non-English10001323
LMArena Chinese—1339
LMArena French—1347
LMArena German—1306
LMArena Japanese—1301
LMArena Korean—1325
LMArena Russian—1328
LMArena Spanish—1313

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Instruction Following10471305
LiveBench Instruction Following—78.3%
IFEval—82.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Longer Query—1320

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LMArena Text10541330
LMArena Creative Writing10891319
LMArena Multi-Turn10131307
WildBench—79%
LiveBench Language—34.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper