Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama 3.2 90B

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 31.8 to 10.4.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.327.1
Released2025-02-052024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
LMArena Coding1322—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
BALROG—27.3%

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1324—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.5
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.6%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math1309—
MATH Level 5—39.4%

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond—41%
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—
LMArena Expert1305—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103), Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision11001000
GeoBench—52%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1323—
LMArena Chinese1339—
LMArena French1346—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1302—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1328—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1305—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1321—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1330—
LMArena Creative Writing1319—
WildBench79%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1307—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Llama 3.2 90B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper