Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 40.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 37.4% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 60.3% for Grok 4.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index37.848.1
Released2025-02-052025-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3248

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
LMArena Coding13221408
Aider Polyglot—79.6%
WeirdML—45.7%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
DeepResearch Bench—47.3%
BALROG—43.6%
LMArena Search—1142
METR Time Horizons—66.6%

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
LMArena Hard Prompts13241409
ForecastBench57.160.9
ARC-AGI-2—16%
SimpleBench—60.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.6%
ARC-AGI-1—66.7%
Chess Puzzles—28%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.44
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
Omni-MATH37.4%60.3%
LMArena Math13091422
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84%
LiveBench Math58.1%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
MMLU-Pro72%85.1%
GPQA (HELM)50%72.7%
LMArena Expert13051415
GPQA Diamond—87%
Confabulations—12.4%

Multimodal Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
LMArena Vision11001210
GeoBench—45%

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
LMArena Non-English13231403
LMArena Chinese13391427
LMArena French13471418
LMArena German13061429
LMArena Japanese13011394
LMArena Korean13251377
LMArena Russian13281410
LMArena Spanish13131420

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
IFEval82.4%94.9%
LMArena Instruction Following13051387
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
LMArena Longer Query13201409
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGrok 4
LMArena Text13301411
LMArena Creative Writing13191397
WildBench79%79.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn13071416
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Grok 4 share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper