Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads 49.0 to 35.5.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index37.832.4
Released2025-01-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.8 (#202), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct35.3%—
LiveBench Coding51.6%—
LMArena Coding—1186
BigCodeBench Complete49.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 24.9 (#156), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning67.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1145
LiveBench Data Analysis55.9%—
LiveBench54.5%—

Math DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.0 (#176), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202551.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math—1152
MATH Level 589.9%—

Knowledge Too close to call

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 30.7 (#225), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
GPQA Diamond55.7%—
LMArena Expert—1142

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1099
LMArena Chinese—1145
LMArena Russian—1092

Instruction Following DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 68.2 (#190), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following69.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1131

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1162

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 49.0 (#194), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Text—1150
LMArena Creative Writing—1129
LMArena Multi-Turn—1108
LiveBench Language23.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper