Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Qwen3 14B
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 35.5 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 138.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3 14B?
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3 14B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.