Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.