Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 Fast in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 27.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 56% for Grok 4.1 Fast.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2025-06-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1411 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1242 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | 56% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 59% | 87.7% |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 61 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
Math Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1399 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | 1201 |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1413 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1376 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1390 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (34.2 vs 34.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Grok 4.1 Fast share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.