Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 25.0 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1270 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1264 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1245 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1275 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.