Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 22.3.
  • Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Gemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index32.137.9
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding12811270
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts13091264
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math13071274
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert12481248
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English13181262
LMArena Russian13351258
LMArena Chinese—1319
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following12991245

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query13171301

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text13341274
LMArena Creative Writing13311242
LMArena Multi-Turn13341275
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper