Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 25.2 to 12.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1291 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1272 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1247 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1252 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.