Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 46.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1457 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1448 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1445 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | 1259 |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1466 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1447 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1420 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1431 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1452 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.