Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs GLM-5
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5 leads 52.3 to 29.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 80% for GLM-5.
- GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 46.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2026-02-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.20 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), GLM-5: 49.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | 48.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1461 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 72.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 69.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.62 |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), GLM-5: 31.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 52.4% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 82.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 73.7% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 86.8% |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,432 |
Reasoning GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), GLM-5: 27.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | 53.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1452 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 145.83 |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 61 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 75% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 44.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
Math GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), GLM-5: 46.4 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 80% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1440 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 65.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 16.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), GLM-5: 52.3 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 87.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1454 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), GLM-5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), GLM-5: 53.7 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1445 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1423 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1454 |
Instruction Following GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), GLM-5: 75.2 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1428 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), GLM-5: 44.7 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1446 |
| CL-bench | — | 18.7% |
Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), GLM-5: 66.0 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1446 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1601 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than GLM-5?
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or GLM-5 better for coding?
GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and GLM-5 share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.