Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Falcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstitutexAI
Noometry Index32.246.2
Released2023-09-062026-03-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding—1457

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts10071448
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math—1442
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert—1445
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English10001440
LMArena Chinese—1475
LMArena French—1466
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following10471420

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query—1431

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text10541450
LMArena Creative Writing10891436
LMArena Multi-Turn10131452

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper