Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs o4-mini
o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 32 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 32 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and o4-mini in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where o4-mini leads 40.8 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.3% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 81.7% for o4-mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 41.6 |
| Released | 2024-05-14 | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.40 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 24.9% | 52.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | 1368 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 45% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 72% |
| GSO | — | 3.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| CadEval | — | 62% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 826.17 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.72 |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102), o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 53.2% |
| GDPval | — | 25.3% |
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |
Reasoning o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1351 |
| DTBench | 53.8% | 77.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | 145.64 |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | 61.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 38.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 58.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 9.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 26.5% |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |
Math o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281), o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | 81.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | 72% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1389 |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | 24.8% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |
Knowledge o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260), o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | 79.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | 82% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | 73.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1343 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 18.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.6% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 18.6% |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81), o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | 1194 |
| GeoBench | 76% | 64% |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| VPCT | — | 57.5% |
Multilingual o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1354 |
| LMArena French | 1258 | 1364 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | 1308 |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | 1312 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1334 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | 1347 |
Instruction Following o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.1% | 92.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1321 |
Long Context o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1315 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 77.8% |
Writing & Preference o4-mini leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1353 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1294 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | 85.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than o4-mini?
o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or o4-mini better for coding?
o4-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and o4-mini share?
32 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.