Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2-72B

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

29.5

Rank #294 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 34.5 to 21.2.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen2-72B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.029.5
Released—2024-06-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1226

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Coding13071196
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861191
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.27

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Math12811235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Expert12761171
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English12651176
LMArena Chinese13461240
LMArena Russian12661169
LMArena French—1169
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Spanish—1168

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following12771181

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query13421193

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2-72B
LMArena Text12881203
LMArena Creative Writing12641181
LMArena Multi-Turn12841195

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2-72B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen2-72B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper