Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2-72B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 34.5 to 21.2.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 29.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.27 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1240 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1181 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1193 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1195 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2-72B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen2-72B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.