Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 15.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 97.1% for Qwen3 Max.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 43.5 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 82.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 142.41 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
Math Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1447 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 72.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1457 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1463 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1420 |
Long Context Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3 Max share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.