Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 15.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 93.3% for Grok 4.3.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index27.343.8
Released2023-12-132026-04-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2440

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
LMArena Coding11081415
LMArena WebDev—1357
SciCode—47.3%
WeirdML—49.9%
ALE-Bench—944.17
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
GDP.pdf—8%
LMArena Search—1165
Vending-Bench 2—35.26

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
LMArena Hard Prompts11091396
DTBench45.9%90.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04149.16
NYT Connections (extended)—55.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—25%
LMCA—38.3%
ForecastBench—60.3

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%93.3%
LMArena Math11321388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—42.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—14.6%
ProofBench—11%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
GPQA Diamond34%88.8%
LMArena Expert10591385
SimpleQA Verified—33.2%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
LMArena Vision—1229
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
LMArena Non-English11381385
LMArena Chinese11241422
LMArena French11451412
LMArena German11251395
LMArena Japanese10231379
LMArena Russian11861399
LMArena Spanish11191398
LMArena Korean—1356

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
LMArena Instruction Following11141366

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
LMArena Longer Query11321393

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.3
LMArena Text11491397
LMArena Creative Writing11311380
LMArena Multi-Turn11391406
EQ-Bench 4—1075

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.3 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper