Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 50.4 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 86.7% for Qwen3 235B-A22B.
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.343.5
Released2023-12-132025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked2449

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding11081445
Aider Polyglot—59.6%
SciCode—42.4%
WeirdML—41%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—52.1%
Vending-Bench 2—-11.34

Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts11091433
DTBench45.9%80.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04143.85
ARC-AGI-2—1.3%
SimpleBench—31%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—69.4%
ARC-AGI-1—11%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
LMCA—29.3%
ForecastBench—59.7

Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%86.7%
LMArena Math11321432
MATH Level 511.2%68.9%
Omni-MATH—71.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
GPQA Diamond34%80.1%
LMArena Expert10591463
SimpleQA Verified—40.4%
MMLU-Pro—84.4%
Confabulations—15.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English11381409
LMArena Chinese11241481
LMArena French11451445
LMArena German11251433
LMArena Japanese10231399
LMArena Russian11861411
LMArena Spanish11191430
LMArena Korean—1391

Instruction Following Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following11141408
IFEval—83.5%

Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query11321426
Fiction.LiveBench—75%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Text11491419
LMArena Creative Writing11311384
LMArena Multi-Turn11391432
Short-Story Creative Writing—83%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1366
WildBench—86.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper