Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 17.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.