Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.