Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads 52.9 to 36.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 56.9% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1108 |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | 61.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 67.8% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 117.04 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 11.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1059 |
| MMLU | 87.3% | 70% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1119 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1114 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1139 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.