Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.9% | 80.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 146.78 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.