Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and o3-pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 34.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 86.9% for o3-pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 42.7 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.9% | 86.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 147.43 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge o3-pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and o3-pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.