Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads 30.4 to 9.3.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 999 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 976 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1026 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 980 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 978 |
Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 988 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.