Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 36.0.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 29.0 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.9% | 47.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 118.51 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
Math Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 35.5% |
| MMLU | 70% | 72.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.