Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 3-70B
Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3-70B in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3-70B leads 42.8 to 36.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 22.6% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3-70B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1206 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 69% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 122.93 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Llama 3-70B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 22.6% |
Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1149 |
| MMLU | 70% | 79.3% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1241 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |
Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1194 |
Long Context Llama 3-70B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1223 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 3-70B?
Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3-70B share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.