Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 36.0.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.