Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 39.1 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1466 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1445 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1430 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1449 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1317 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1434 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.