Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-4.6V
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.6V leads 38.0 to 15.6.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-12-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.90 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1390 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1368 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GLM-4.6V: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1371 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1340 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1352 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1360 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-4.6V?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-4.6V better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-4.6V share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.