Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1488 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 84.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1503 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1471 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.