Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1503 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1488 |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1503 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.