Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 50.5 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.345.3
Released2023-12-132026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked2432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding11081473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts11091460
DTBench45.9%84%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04147.37
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
LMCA—37.6%

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%93.3%
LMArena Math11321466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond34%87.9%
LMArena Expert10591467
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English11381445
LMArena Chinese11241510
LMArena French11451473
LMArena German11251471
LMArena Japanese10231413
LMArena Russian11861457
LMArena Spanish11191457
LMArena Korean—1415

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following11141440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query11321455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text11491455
LMArena Creative Writing11311439
LMArena Multi-Turn11391460

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper