Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 57.8 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 98.1% for Grok 4.7.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index27.353.1
Released2023-12-132026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2439

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Coding11081427
FrontierCode—47.6%
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1639
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.8%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents—54.6%
GDP.pdf—22.8%
Vending-Bench 2—10,537

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts11091413
DTBench45.9%96%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04153.53
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
LMCA—49.4%

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%98.1%
LMArena Math11321407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—53%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
ProofBench—34%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
GPQA Diamond34%92.7%
LMArena Expert10591422
SimpleQA Verified—56%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Vision—1228
Blueprint-Bench 2—32.5%
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English11381389
LMArena Chinese11241455
LMArena French11451455
LMArena Russian11861397
LMArena Spanish11191400
LMArena German1125—
LMArena Japanese1023—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following11141404

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query11321413

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Text11491399
LMArena Creative Writing11311391
LMArena Multi-Turn11391393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.7 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper