Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

53.3

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 98.9% for GPT-6 Luna.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index27.353.3
Released2023-12-132026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Coding11081439
DeepSWE—66.6%
FrontierCode—42.4%
LMArena WebDev—1581
SciCode—54.6%
ALE-Bench—1,577
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
APEX-Agents—44.3%
GDP.pdf—23%

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Hard Prompts11091411
DTBench45.9%90.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04156.28
ARC-AGI-2—59.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—68.7%
ARC-AGI-1—86.7%
CritPt—19.4%
Chess Puzzles—31%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
LMCA—44.5%

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%98.9%
LMArena Math11321416
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—78.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—56.1%
ProofBench—64%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
GPQA Diamond34%90.5%
LMArena Expert10591444
SimpleQA Verified—41.4%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Vision—1217
Blueprint-Bench 2—31.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Non-English11381386
LMArena Chinese11241433
LMArena French11451420
LMArena German11251369
LMArena Japanese10231369
LMArena Russian11861394
LMArena Spanish11191393
LMArena Korean—1360

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Instruction Following11141409

Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Longer Query11321409

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Text11491391
LMArena Creative Writing11311363
LMArena Multi-Turn11391396

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-6 Luna share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper