Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 66.7 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.3% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index52.827.3
Released2026-09-092023-12-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3724

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Coding15061108
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
ALE-Bench1,092—
HumanEval+—55.5%
MBPP+—61.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14831109
DTBench89.9%45.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9117.04
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%1.1%
LMArena Math14771132
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
ProofBench54%—
MATH Level 5—11.2%

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
GPQA Diamond89.8%34%
LMArena Expert15061059
MMLU—70%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English14481138
LMArena Chinese14971124
LMArena French14521145
LMArena German14841125
LMArena Japanese14121023
LMArena Russian14711186
LMArena Spanish14591119
LMArena Korean1452—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14741114

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Longer Query14751132

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Text14621149
LMArena Creative Writing14351131
LMArena Multi-Turn14571139
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper