Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-5

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5 leads 46.4 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 80% for GLM-5.
  • GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index27.346.1
Released2023-12-132026-02-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked2445

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GLM-5: 49.0 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
LMArena Coding11081461
SWE-bench Verified—72.1%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1434
SWE-bench Multilingual—69.7%
WeirdML—48.2%
ALE-Bench—765.62
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GLM-5: 31.1 (#71)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
Terminal-Bench—52.4%
τ²-bench Airline—82.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—73.7%
τ²-bench Telecom—86.8%
Vending-Bench 2—4,432

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GLM-5: 27.6 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
LMArena Hard Prompts11091452
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04145.83
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
SimpleBench—53.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—75%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-1—44.7%
Chess Puzzles—10%
DTBench45.9%—
ForecastBench—61

Math GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GLM-5: 46.4 (#71)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%80%
LMArena Math11321440
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—65.7%
MATH Level 511.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—16.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GLM-5: 52.3 (#64)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
GPQA Diamond34%87.8%
LMArena Expert10591454
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.1%
MMLU70%—

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GLM-5: 53.7 (#58)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
LMArena Non-English11381430
LMArena Chinese11241511
LMArena French11451455
LMArena German11251445
LMArena Japanese10231416
LMArena Russian11861436
LMArena Spanish11191454
LMArena Korean—1423

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GLM-5: 75.2 (#67)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
LMArena Instruction Following11141428

Long Context GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GLM-5: 44.7 (#60)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
LMArena Longer Query11321446
CL-bench—18.7%

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GLM-5: 66.0 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5
LMArena Text11491446
LMArena Creative Writing11311439
LMArena Multi-Turn11391456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1601

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-5?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-5 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-5 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.

Related comparisons

Go deeper