Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Inkling-Small leads 45.1 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 90% for Inkling-Small.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
ProviderGoogleThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index27.346.5
Released2023-12-132026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked2433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
LMArena Coding11081451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts11091423
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04150.15
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
DTBench45.9%—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%90%
LMArena Math11321459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
ProofBench—6%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
GPQA Diamond34%88.5%
LMArena Expert10591442
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English11381402
LMArena Chinese11241465
LMArena French11451436
LMArena German11251405
LMArena Japanese10231405
LMArena Russian11861391
LMArena Spanish11191428
LMArena Korean—1363

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following11141399

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query11321401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProInkling-Small
LMArena Text11491414
LMArena Creative Writing11311331
LMArena Multi-Turn11391418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Inkling-Small share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper