Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 leads 48.4 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 84% for Grok 4.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index27.348.1
Released2023-12-132025-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2448

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
LMArena Coding11081408
Aider Polyglot—79.6%
WeirdML—45.7%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
DeepResearch Bench—47.3%
BALROG—43.6%
LMArena Search—1142
METR Time Horizons—66.6%

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
LMArena Hard Prompts11091409
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04146.44
ARC-AGI-2—16%
SimpleBench—60.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.6%
ARC-AGI-1—66.7%
Chess Puzzles—28%
DTBench45.9%—
ForecastBench—60.9

Math Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%84%
LMArena Math11321422
Omni-MATH—60.3%
MATH Level 511.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
GPQA Diamond34%87%
LMArena Expert10591415
MMLU-Pro—85.1%
Confabulations—12.4%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
LMArena Vision—1210
GeoBench—45%

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
LMArena Non-English11381403
LMArena Chinese11241427
LMArena French11451418
LMArena German11251429
LMArena Japanese10231394
LMArena Russian11861410
LMArena Spanish11191420
LMArena Korean—1377

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
LMArena Instruction Following11141387
IFEval—94.9%

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
LMArena Longer Query11321409
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4
LMArena Text11491411
LMArena Creative Writing11311397
LMArena Multi-Turn11391416
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
WildBench—79.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper