Model comparison
Grok 4 vs Mixtral 8x22B
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 9 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4 leads 53.8 to 15.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 87% for Grok 4 and 34.1% for Mixtral 8x22B.
- Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 48.1 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-07-09 | 2024-04-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 48 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 45.7% | 3.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1166 |
| Aider Polyglot | 79.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 64.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 43% | 7.5% |
| Terminal-Bench | 27.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 63% | — |
| GDPval | 21.1% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.3% | — |
| BALROG | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.6% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1150 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.44 | 122.03 |
| ForecastBench | 60.9 | 56.3 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 16% | — |
| SimpleBench | 60.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 66.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | — | 55.1% |
Math Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 60.3% | 16.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1184 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 24.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 19.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87% | 34.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 85.1% | 46% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 72.7% | 33.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1415 | 1113 |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| MMLU | — | 77.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Mixtral 8x22B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1210 | — |
| GeoBench | 45% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1403 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1116 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | 1166 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1141 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1394 | 1037 |
| LMArena Korean | 1377 | 1057 |
| LMArena Russian | 1410 | 1158 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1151 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 94.9% | 72.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1147 |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1144 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1397 | 1141 |
| WildBench | 79.7% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1416 | 1130 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4 better than Mixtral 8x22B?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4 or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Mixtral 8x22B share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.