Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok-3 mini
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok-3 mini leads 40.3 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 90.9% for Grok-3 mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 41.0 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1380 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1374 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 140.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1386 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 90.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |
Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 76.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1395 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1343 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1352 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1379 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1356 |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |
Long Context Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1342 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1355 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok-3 mini?
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok-3 mini better for coding?
Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok-3 mini share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.