Model comparison
Grok-3 mini vs Llama 3.2 90B
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok-3 mini leads 42.1 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 77.8% for Grok-3 mini and 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 27.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | 125.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | — |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | 39.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1386 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 41% |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena French | 1357 | — |
| LMArena German | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1335 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-3 mini better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Llama 3.2 90B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.