Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 9.3.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 27.3 |
| Released | — | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1108 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1109 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.04 |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1132 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1059 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| MMLU | — | 70% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1119 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1114 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1132 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.