Model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Llama 3.2 90B

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

53.3

Rank #36 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 11.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for GPT-6 Luna and 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
GPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index53.327.5
Released2026-09-222024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked429

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
DeepSWE66.6%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode54.6%—
LMArena Coding1439—
ALE-Bench1,577—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54), Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
APEX-Agents44.3%—
BALROG—27.3%
GDP.pdf23%—

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
Epoch Capabilities Index156.28125.5
ARC-AGI-259.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)68.7%—
ARC-AGI-186.7%—
CritPt19.4%—
Chess Puzzles31%—
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1411—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench90.1%—
LMCA44.5%—

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%2.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)78.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 456.1%—
ProofBench64%—
LMArena Math1416—
MATH Level 5—39.4%

Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond90.5%41%
SimpleQA Verified41.4%—
LMArena Expert1444—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision12171000
GeoBench—52%
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly44.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1386—
LMArena Chinese1433—
LMArena French1420—
LMArena German1369—
LMArena Japanese1369—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Russian1394—
LMArena Spanish1393—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following1409—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1409—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1391—
LMArena Creative Writing1363—
LMArena Multi-Turn1396—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Llama 3.2 90B?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Llama 3.2 90B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 42 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper