Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.4 to 9.3.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1347 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1354 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1353 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1311 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1304 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-4.5V share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.