Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 3
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 88.7% for Grok 3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1434 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 138.33 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
Math Grok 3 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1391 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 88.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1421 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Grok 3 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1417 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1373 |
Instruction Following Grok 3 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |
Long Context Grok 3 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1425 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1186 |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 3?
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 3 better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 3 share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.